Analysis of The Students’ of Biology and PPG Program Response through Online Lectures during The Covid-19 Period as A Means of Obtaining Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37182/jik.v6i2.77Keywords:
response, online lecture, covid-19 pandemicAbstract
The Covid-19 pandemic hitting the world in early 2020 killed 534.484 people and also caused 11,423,843 confirmed cases of people even if 6. 6.473.335 people have experienced recovery (Tuti et al., 2021). To prevent the spread of Covid-19, The Indonesian Government implements social distancing and requires all activities and public services online from home, including learning. UNDANA as one of the university in Indonesia applies such a strategy based on Surat Edaran Rektor Undana No.: 1699/UN. 15.1/TU/2020. Such lectures certainly bring advantages and disadvantages for students. The impact can be known from the responses of the extracted research subjects. The subjects of this research were students of the Biology Study Program who programmed Animal Physiology, Biochemestry and PPG students who programmed Developmental and Animal Physiology, particularly those concerning enzymes, hormones, and metabolism with a total of 48, 37, and 27, respectively. The problem in this research is how they respond to the implementation of this lecture strategy? The purpose of this research is to find out their response about the lecture strategy that is being carried out. The data of this research are all their opinions in response to the reason for not understanding all the material presented, unable to give proper answer, cannot think critically to express their thoughts effectively and coherently. The results of the analysis of all responses as data show that: (1) 69 individuals (61. 607%) appreciate government policies unconditionally; (2) 31 individuals (27.679%) disagree; (3) 12 individuals (10.714%) forced to do so because they have no other choice, (4) 79 individuals (70. 53%) said it was not effective at all, (5) 33 individuals (29.46%) said it was effective, 12 individuals (10%) said it was conditionally effective provided that students tried to explore the materials that had been taught by asking for additional explanations from the lecture outside of class hours to overcome the obstacles faced, (6) 87 individuals (77.679%), approved the implementation of such a lecture strategy (E-Learning, LMS, WA Group, Google Meet, Zoom Meeting) because of the benefits obtained by students, (7) 22.321% (25 individuals) disagreed because it was not profitable. All respondents also said: (1) effective communication was not implemented during lectures due to network disruptions as a result of weather or location of residential areas that were not covered by the network, (2) the government’s decision to conduct this lecture strategy is the best way (very good) to prevent losing the moment of obtaining lecture material during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Downloads
References
Aina, M. (2016). Pengembangan Multi media Interaktif Menggunakan Camtasia Studio 8 Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Materi Kultur Jaringan Untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XI MIA. Biodik, 2 (1).
Arzayeva, M., Rakhimzhanov, K., Abdarahmanova, A., & Umitkaliev, U. (2015). Special Aspects of distance learning in educational syatem. Antropologist, 22(3),449-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09720073.2015.11891900.
Black S. (2005). Teaching Student to Think Critically. The Education Digest, 70(6), 42-47.
Bel et al, 2006 dalam Ali Sadikin, & Afreni Hamidah, 2020 (Pembeljaran daring di tengah wabah covid-19. Biodik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi. Volume 6, Nomo2 02, hal 214-224. https:// online-journal.unja.ac.id/bidik
Bell S. Douce, Cairo, S., Texeira, A., Martin-Aranda, R., & Otto, D. (2017). Sustainability and Distance Learning: a diverse European experience? Open Learning, 32 (2), 95-102. https://doi. org/10.1080/02680513.2017.1319638.
Duron, R., Limbach B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. In-ternational Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17 (2), 160-166.
Perry, D. K. Perry; Michael S. Retallik, & Tghomas H. Paulsen. (2014). A Critical Thinking Benchmark for a Department of Agriculture Education and Studies. Journal of Agriculture Education, 55 (5), 207-221. Doi: 10.5032/jae.2014-05307.
Sumaryono. E. (1999). Hermeneutik: Sebuah Metode Filsafat. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Habermas. J. (1972). Knowlegde And Human Interests, Boston, Beacon-Press.
Ian J. Quitadamo: Celia L. Faiola, James E. Johnson, & Martha J. Kurtz. (2008). Community Inquiry Improves Critical Thinking in General Education Biology. Article: CEF-Life Scinece Education.Vol. 7 327-337.Doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-11-0097.
Jariyah, I.A. & Esti Tyastirin. (2020). Proses dan Kendala Pembelajaran Biologi Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Analisis Respons Mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, Vol 4 (2): 183-196. : 184
Lia Nur Atiqoh Bela Dina. (2020). Respons Orang Tua Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring pada Masa Pandemi. THUFULI: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini. Voluume 2 Nomor 1 e. ISSN: 2685-16X.
Liu, J., Liao; S. Yuan, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.S.; Liu, L.; & Zang, Z. (2020). Community Transmission of severe acute resiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Shenzhen, China. Emerging Infectious disease, 26 (6).
Mulyasa, E. (2004). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Konsep, Karakteristik, dan Implementasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdokarya.
Nickerson, R. S. (1994). The teaching of thinking and problem solving . In R.J Stenrberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp 121-132). San Diego. Academic Press. In S. Chee Choy and Phaik Kin Cheah. 2009. Teacher Perception of Critical Thinking Amongs Students and Its In-fluence on Higher Education. Vol. 20 No.2 .198-206: ISSN 1812-9129.
Oknisih, N., & Suyoto, S. (2019). Penggunaan Aplen (Aplikasi Online) Sebagai Upaya Kemandi-rian Belajar Siswa. Dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar. Vol. 1, No. 01.
Paul, R. W. (1995). Introduction. In R.W Paul (Ed), Critical thinking: How to prepare students for rapidly changing world. Santa Rose, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Taek, Paulus. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran: Refleksi Penulis Tentang Upaya Penguasaan Ilmu Pengetahuan. Kupang: Gita Kasih.
Taek, Paulus. (2009). Petulangan Intelektual Menuju Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Kupang: Gita Kasih.
Tjahjadi, S.P. Lilik. (1991). Hukum Moral: Ajaran Immanuel Kant Tentang Etika dan Imperatif Kategories. Pustaka Filsafat. BPK Gunung Mulia. Yogyakarta: Kamisius.
Sun, S.Y.H. (2014). Leraner Perspectives on Fully Online Language Learning. Distance Educati-on. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.891428
Sobron, A.N., & Bayu, R. (2019). Persepsi Siswa Dalam Studi Pengaruh Daring Learning terhadap Minat Belajar IPA. Scaffolding: Jurnal PendidikanIslam dan Multikulturalisme, 1(2), 30-38.
Tuti, K, Irwan Ridwan Yusup, Asni Sri Hermawati, Devi Kusuma hwardani, Dewi Wijayanti & Irhamudzikri. (2021). Respons Guru Terhadap Kendala Proses Pembelajaran Biologi Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA. Volume 7, No. 1, pp 40-46. DOI: 10.31949/educatio,v7il.765.
Wagner, T. (2008). The Global achievement gap: Why even our best school don’t teach the new survival skills our children need and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books. In Dustin K. Perry et al, 2014. A Critical Thinking Benchmark for a Department of Agricultural Education and Studies.
Willsen, J. (1995). Critical Thinking: Identifying the targets. In R. W.Paul, Crtical thinking: How to prepare students for rapidly changing world. Santa Rose, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
An author who publishes in the Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
